Comparison of manual statements from out-of-hospital trauma training programs and a national guideline on treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries.

PURPOSE: Training programs help establish evidence-based knowledge in prehospital emergency care. This study aimed to compare manual statements from prehospital trauma training programs and evidence-based guidelines on treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries. METHODS: A systematic comparison with the primary endpoint of the highest grades of recommendation (GoR A, "must") of the current version of the German guidelines and recent recommendations of the prehospital trauma training programs International Trauma Life Support (ITLS), Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS), and Traumamanagement® (TM) based on their official textbooks was done. The recommendations were categorized as agreement or minor or major variation. The comparison was made using a rating system by experts who were blinded to the training programs. If the consensus strength of the experts was < 75%, affected statements were finalized in a Delphi procedure. RESULTS: Overall, 92 statements were compared. Fleiss-kappa of the first rating was 0.385 (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.376-0.393). Finally, comparable recommendations of the guideline with the training programs in principle agree with the statement of the guidelines were > 90% for all programs. The agreement with GoR A recommendations and each course program were 33.9%, 30.6%, and 35.5% (ITLS, PHTLS, and TM, respectively), p = 0.715. CONCLUSIONS: Despite small differences, the training programs showed high degrees of compliance with the guidelines and international agreement with some minor differences. Furthermore, the results did not allow any conclusions regarding the quality of the courses, the didactic methodology, and local adaptability. The practical implementation of the courses is probably even higher and closer to the guidelines.

Comparing the Short-Term Outcome after Polytrauma and Proximal Femur Fracture in Geriatric Patients.

Because of demographic change, geriatric patients are becoming a major challenge for traumatology. Multiple trauma patients and patients with proximal femoral fractures are important groups of patients in geriatric traumatology. This retrospective study compares two patient groups with different severities of injuries, and analyzes their patient characteristics and short-term outcomes, focusing on functionality upon discharge. The investigation aims to present the characterizing features of both patient groups, and to identify the potential risk factors for early functionality after trauma. The patient collective comprises two patient groups: a polytrauma group with 91 patients, and a femoral fracture group with 132 patients. Under the control of potential influencing factors, the present study showed no significant influence of belonging to either of the patient groups (multiple trauma or proximal femoral fracture) on the mobility status at discharge. Age, known dementia, pre-clinical intubation, and the lowest Hb value were identified as significant influencing factors. Despite their old age and vulnerability, the majority of geriatric patients survive accidents. Further prospective investigations concerning the maintenance or restoration of functionality after an accident are therefore desirable.

Training to identify red flags in the acute care of trauma: who are the patients at risk for early death despite a relatively good prognosis? An analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®.

BACKGROUND: In the acute care of trauma, some patients with a low estimated risk of death die suddenly and unexpectedly. In this study, we aim to identify predictors for early death within 24 h following hospital admission in low-risk patients. METHODS: The TraumaRegister DGU® was used to collect records of patients who were primarily treated in a participating hospital between 2004 and 2013 with a RISC II score below 10%. RESULTS: During the study period, 64,379 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean RISC II score was 2.0%, and the mean ISS was 16 ± 9. The overall hospital mortality rate was 2.1%, and 0.5% of patients (n = 301) died within the first 24 h. A SPB of ≤ 90 mmHg was associated with an increased risk of death (p < 0.001). An AIS abdomen score of ≥ 3 was associated with increased risk of death within the first 24 h (p < 0.001). A high risk of early death was also seen in patients with an AIS score (thorax) ≥ 3; 51% of those who died died within the first 24 h (p < 0.005). Death in patients over 60 years was more common after 24 h (p < 0.001). Patients with an ASA score of ≥ 3 were more likely to die after the first 24 h (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Indicators predicting a high risk of early death in patients with a low RISC II score include a SPB ≤ 90 mmHg and severe chest and abdominal trauma. Emergency teams involved in the acute care of trauma patients should be aware of these "red flags" and treat their patients accordingly.

Spinal Immobilization in the Trauma Room - a Survey-Based Analysis at German Level I Trauma Centers. / Die Immobilisation der Wirbelsäule im Schockraum ­ eine umfragebasierte Analyse in den deutschen überregionalen Traumazentren.

BACKGROUND: Spinal immobilization is a standard procedure in daily out-of-hospital emergency care. Homogenous recommendations concerning the immobilization of trauma patients during the first therapy in the emergency department do not exist. The aim of the current study was the analysis of the existing strategies concerning spinal immobilization in German level I trauma centers by an internet-based survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study is a survey-based analysis of the current strategies concerning spinal immobilization in all 107 level I trauma centers in Germany. The internet-based survey consists of 6 items asking about immobilization in the emergency department. RESULTS: The return rate was 47.7%. In 14 (28.6%) level I trauma centers the patients remained immobilized on the immobilization tool used by the professional emergency care providers. In 19 (38.8%) level I trauma centers the patients were transferred to a stretcher with a soft positioning mattress on it. Patient transfer to a spineboard or to a TraumaMattress was performed in 11 (22.4%) and 7 (14.3%) level I trauma centers, respectively. Trauma patients were never transferred to a vacuum mattress. Cervical spine protection was most of the time performed by a cervical collar (n = 48; 98.0%). In general, the survey's participants were mainly satisfied (mean = 84/100) with the current strategy of spinal immobilization. The satisfaction was best if the spineboard is used. DISCUSSION: Patient positioning during initial emergency therapy in the emergency department of German level I trauma centers is highly heterogenous. Besides complete full body immobilization, also the lack of any immobilization was reported by the survey's participants.

Development of a Patient-Specific Finite Element Model for Predicting Implant Failure in Pelvic Ring Fracture Fixation.

Introduction. The main purpose of this study is to develop an efficient technique for generating FE models of pelvic ring fractures that is capable of predicting possible failure regions of osteosynthesis with acceptable accuracy. Methods. Patient-specific FE models of two patients with osteoporotic pelvic fractures were generated. A validated FE model of an uninjured pelvis from our previous study was used as a master model. Then, fracture morphologies and implant positions defined by a trauma surgeon in the preoperative CT were manually introduced as 3D splines to the master model. Four loading cases were used as boundary conditions. Regions of high stresses in the models were compared with actual locations of implant breakages and loosening identified from follow-up X-rays. Results. Model predictions and the actual clinical outcomes matched well. For Patient A, zones of increased tension and maximum stress coincided well with the actual locations of implant loosening. For Patient B, the model predicted accurately the loosening of the implant in the anterior region. Conclusion. Since a significant reduction in time and labour was achieved in our mesh generation technique, it can be considered as a viable option to be implemented as a part of the clinical routine to aid presurgical planning and postsurgical management of pelvic ring fracture patients.

Corrigendum to "Development of a Patient-Specific Finite Element Model for Predicting Implant Failure in Pelvic Ring Fracture Fixation".

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2017/9403821.].